王海燕, 杨鹏飞, 薛玉生, 郑强荪, 汤雁玲, 王毅. ST段抬高型心肌梗死的年轻患者冠脉介入术策略初探[J]. 心脏杂志, 2010, 22(3): 379-381.
    引用本文: 王海燕, 杨鹏飞, 薛玉生, 郑强荪, 汤雁玲, 王毅. ST段抬高型心肌梗死的年轻患者冠脉介入术策略初探[J]. 心脏杂志, 2010, 22(3): 379-381.
    Therapeutic strategy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in young and middle-aged patients[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2010, 22(3): 379-381.
    Citation: Therapeutic strategy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in young and middle-aged patients[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2010, 22(3): 379-381.

    ST段抬高型心肌梗死的年轻患者冠脉介入术策略初探

    Therapeutic strategy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in young and middle-aged patients

    • 摘要: 目的: 通过分析青中年ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的冠状动脉造影(CAG)结果,初步探讨这类人群的最佳冠脉再通策略。方法: 2007年1月~2008年10月224位因STEMI在第四军医大学唐都医院心脏内科行冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)术的患者,入院后给与静脉溶栓或经皮球囊扩张术(PTCA)的首次再通治疗,根据其后8 d的CAG结果将患者分为支架植入组(n=160,男/女=132/28)和未植入支架组(n=64,男/女=64/0)。分析比较两组患者的基本情况、临床表现、病变情况以及首次再通治疗后8 d和6个月的CAG情况。结果:①未植入支架组患者年龄 (32±3)岁,显著小于支架植入组(58±7)岁,P<0.01;男性患者比例显著增高;并发糖尿病、高血压病、高血脂症患者的比例和体质量指数均显著低于植入支架组;无1例既往发生过心梗或心绞痛症状;疲劳和饮酒是其发病的主要诱因(均P<0.01)。②首次血管再通治疗后8 d CAG结果:未植入支架组全部是前降支单支病变,而植入支架组有148例患者为多支病变(P<0.01);受累血管的前向血流未植入支架组全部达到TIMI Ⅲ级,植入支架组仅有88例患者(P<0.01);受累血管管腔狭窄程度前者为(37±10)%,显著轻于后者(82±8)%,P<0.01。6个月CAG复查结果:受累血管的前向血流两组患者均达到TIMI Ⅲ级;管腔狭窄程度两组无显著差异,而且未植入支架组的管腔狭窄程度显著优于首次血管再通治疗后(P<0.01)。结论: 对下列患者植入支架应慎重: ①年龄≤40岁;②梗塞血管再通后CAG示:受累血管壁光滑且管腔狭窄≤50%;③无其他需要行PCI处理的冠脉血管病变。

       

      Abstract: AIM: To study the therapeutic strategy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in young and middle-aged patients by analyzing the characteristics of the culprit vessel revealed by coronary angiography (CAG). METHODS: A total of 224 patients with STEMI being treated at the Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University were divided into stent group (n=160, M/F=132/28) and non-stent group (n=64, M/F=64/0) according to the characteristics of the culprit vessel in CAG 8 days after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or thrombolysis. The basic conditions, clinical manifestations, coronary lesion characteristics, predisposing factors and results of the CAG 8 days and 6 months after primary revascularization were observed and compared between groups. RESULTS: Compared with patients in the stent group, patients who had no pectoris in the non-stent group were significantly younger in age (P<0.01). There were more male patients and fewer patients with diabetes, hyperlipidemia and hypertension were observed. Fatigue and alcohol were the major predisposing factors. Results of the CAG 8 days after primary revascularization indicated that patients in the non-stent group all suffered from single-vessel coronary disease of the anterior descending branch, whereas 148 patients in the stent-implanted group suffered from multi-vessel coronary disease (P<0.01). The culprit vessel in all cases in the non-stent group reached TIMI grade 3, whereas only 88 cases in the stent group reached TIMI grade 3. Mean luminal diameter stenosis of the culprit vessel in the non-stent group was (0.37±0.10) mm, greater than in the stent group (0.82±0.08) mm, P<0.01. Results of the CAG 6 months after primary revascularization indicated that the mean luminal diameter stenosis of the culprit vessel was smaller than it was 8 days after primary revascularization in the non-stent group (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that stent implantation should be cautiously used in patients ≤40 years of age and with smooth luminal surface and diameter stenosis ≤50% or in patients with no other coronary lesions for stent implantation.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回