张玉顺, 朱鲜阳. RESPECT远期随访结果能否结束PFO封堵疗效的争论?[J]. 心脏杂志, 2016, 28(4): 377-379.
    引用本文: 张玉顺, 朱鲜阳. RESPECT远期随访结果能否结束PFO封堵疗效的争论?[J]. 心脏杂志, 2016, 28(4): 377-379.
    Can RESPECT extended follow-up results end controversy of patent foramen ovale interventional therapy?[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2016, 28(4): 377-379.
    Citation: Can RESPECT extended follow-up results end controversy of patent foramen ovale interventional therapy?[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2016, 28(4): 377-379.

    RESPECT远期随访结果能否结束PFO封堵疗效的争论?

    Can RESPECT extended follow-up results end controversy of patent foramen ovale interventional therapy?

    • 摘要: RESPECT研究是一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验,对卵圆孔未闭(PFO)并发不明原因脑卒中患者应用Amplatzer PFO 封堵器(St.Jude Medical,Inc.,St.Paul,MN)经导管PFO封堵+药物治疗与单独药物治疗进行对比,比较其二者在降低脑卒中复发风险方面是否有统计学差异。初步研究结果于2013年发表在新英格兰医学杂志上,其结果表明在预防不明原因脑卒中复发方面,经导管PFO封堵与药物治疗相比无统计学差异。但2015年10月15日在美国TCT会议上,公布了RESPECT研究的长期随访结果,得出了预防不明原因脑卒中复发,使用Amplatzer PFO封堵器行经导管PFO封堵优于药物治疗的最终结论。本文主要简介了RESPECT研究的主要内容和近期、远期结果,并对其作出笔者的评价。

       

      Abstract: The RESPECT trial is a randomized clinical trial investigating the safety and efficacy of transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure using the Amplatzer PFO occluder (St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, MN) in the secondary prevention of recurrent cryptogenic stroke vs. medical management. Results of the preliminary study were published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2013, which showed that there was no significant difference in the prevention of cryptogenic stroke between transcatheter closure of PFO and drug treatment. During the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics Conference in the United States (October 15, 2015), the extended follow-up results of the RESPECT study were announced and the results showed that Amplatzer PFO Occluder was superior to medical management in reducing recurrent cryptogenic ischemic stroke. This article explains the main content along with recent and long-term results of the RESPECT study and presents the author’s evaluation.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回