罗礼云, 李 铁, 彭 虹. 对慢性心力衰竭患者进行院外干预的依从性及其效果[J]. 心脏杂志, 2014, 26(3): 313-316.
    引用本文: 罗礼云, 李 铁, 彭 虹. 对慢性心力衰竭患者进行院外干预的依从性及其效果[J]. 心脏杂志, 2014, 26(3): 313-316.
    Impact of out-of-hospital multifactorial intensive intervention on patients with chronic heart failure[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2014, 26(3): 313-316.
    Citation: Impact of out-of-hospital multifactorial intensive intervention on patients with chronic heart failure[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2014, 26(3): 313-316.

    对慢性心力衰竭患者进行院外干预的依从性及其效果

    Impact of out-of-hospital multifactorial intensive intervention on patients with chronic heart failure

    • 摘要: 目的:观察对慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者进行院外干预的效果。方法:通过前瞻性随机对照方法,将215名出院的心力衰竭(HF)患者随机分为普通随访组和强化干预组,通过1年的随访观察,最终完成随访的患者共计205例。普通随访组仅进行常规的门诊随访,强化干预组患者接受电话咨询、专门的心力衰竭门诊随诊及定期健康宣教。结果:强化干预组和普通组相比较,限水限钠达标率和坚持每天监测体质量的比例大幅度增加(P<0.01),强化干预组利尿剂的使用率明显高于普通组(P<0.01),血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)/血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂(ARB)类药物、β受体阻滞剂的靶剂量达标率方面明显高于普通组(P<0.01),强化干预组左室射血分数高于普通随访组;与普通随访组相比,强化干预组氨基端脑钠肽前体(NT-pro-BNP)降低更明显(P<0.05),且6分钟步行试验优于普通组(P<0.05)。两组再次入院和总心血管事件发生率有显著差异(3% vs. 11%,P<0.05),强化干预措施显著降低了死亡和再住院联合终点事件的发生率。结论: 对CHF患者进行院外强化干预,可以提高患者的自我管理能力,提高抗HF治疗药物的使用比例及二级预防药物的靶剂量达标率,降低再住院率和心血管事件发生率。

       

      Abstract: AIM:To observe the efficacy of out-of-hospital multifactorial intensive intervention on patients with chronic heart failure. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in 215 patients with chronic heart failure. Patients were discharged from hospital and randomized into conventional follow-up group and intensive intervention group. The 215 patients were followed for 12 months and 205 of the patients completed the follow-up. Conventional follow-up group received only routine follow-up examination, whereas the intensive intervention group, in addition to the routine follow-up examination, received telephone counseling, specialized follow-up from heart failure clinics, and regular health education. RESULTS: The percentages of patients limiting water and salt intake and measuring body weight in intensive intervention group were markedly increased (P<0.01). The percentages of using diuretics and achieving target dose rate of ACEI/ARB/beta blockers were higher in intensive intervention group. The percentages of left ventricular ejection fraction and completing the 6-minute walking test were also higher in intensive intervention group, whereas the level of NT-pro-BNP was lower in intensive intervention group. Compared with those in the conventional follow-up group, the rehospitalization rate and incidence of cardiovascular events were lower in the intensive intervention group. CONCLUSION: Out-of-hospital multifactorial intensive intervention is helpful in improving the clinical outcome for patients with chronic heart failure.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回