王星烨, 成革胜, 张玉顺, 何 璐, 杜亚娟. 超声测量卵圆孔未闭直径与球囊伸展径的比较[J]. 心脏杂志, 2015, 27(4): 394-396.
    引用本文: 王星烨, 成革胜, 张玉顺, 何 璐, 杜亚娟. 超声测量卵圆孔未闭直径与球囊伸展径的比较[J]. 心脏杂志, 2015, 27(4): 394-396.
    Correlation between patent foramen ovale size measured by echocardiography and balloon stretched diameter[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2015, 27(4): 394-396.
    Citation: Correlation between patent foramen ovale size measured by echocardiography and balloon stretched diameter[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2015, 27(4): 394-396.

    超声测量卵圆孔未闭直径与球囊伸展径的比较

    Correlation between patent foramen ovale size measured by echocardiography and balloon stretched diameter

    • 摘要: 目的 比较卵圆孔未闭(PFO)大小的判断方法。方法 47例PFO患者,年龄9~68(42±17)岁。经食管超声心动图(TEE)测量大小,经胸超声心动图声学造影(cTTE)测量右向左分流量(RLS)及球囊导管测量PFO伸展径(BSD)。结果 cTTE静息状态下PFO无RLS组TEE测量PFO大小为(3±1)mm,有RLS的大小为(5±1)mm,有RLS组PFO直径明显大于无RLS组(P<0.01)。TEE 测量PFO最大径为(4±1)mm,球囊测量伸展径为(9±4)mm,伸展径明显大于TEE最大径(P<0.01),两者显著相关(r=0.98,P<0.01)。简单型PFO的TEE测量最大径,与球囊测量伸展径非常接近,相关程度更好,复杂型PFO的TEE测量值明显小于BSD,相关程度较低。结论 cTTE静息状态下RLS分流量越多,PFO的TEE裂隙越大;TEE测量PFO最大径明显小于其伸展径;TEE结合cTTE静息有无RLS有助于判断大型PFO。

       

      Abstract: AIM To explore the method to determine the size of patent foramen ovale (PFO). METHODS Forty-seven patients, at the age of 9 to 68 years (42±17 years), were included in this study. The PFO size was measured by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and the correlation between the volume of right-to-left shunt (RLS) by transthoracic echocardiography (cTTE) and the balloon stretched diameter (BSD) for PFO was investigated. RESULTS In the resting state, the PFO diameters measured by TEE were 3±1mm for patients without PFO-RLS and (5±1) mm for patients with PFO-RLS. cTTE measurement showed that in the resting state the PFO size of patients with RLS was larger than that of patients without RLS (P<0.01). The maximum sizes of PFO measured by TEE were (4±1) mm and the balloon stretched diameters were (9±4) mm. The BSD was significantly related to the maximum size of PFO measured by TEE (r=0.98, P<0.01) and was much larger than the measured maximum size of PFO measured by TEE (P<0.01). In patients with simple PFO, there was a tiny difference between the maximum size of PFO measured by TEE and the BSD, indicating a higher correlation between them. In patients with complex PFO, the value measured by TEE was significantly smaller than the BSD, where a lower correlation was indicated. CONCLUSION The more the volume of RLS is in the resting state, the larger the PFO size measured by TEE and the BSD are. The maximum size of PFO measured by TEE is significantly smaller than the BSD. The maximum size of PFO measured by TEE, together with cTTE measurements of RLS, is beneficial to the determination of large PFO.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回