邵 山, 王小青, 钱 波, 孙建辉. 右心室流出道间隔部起搏对完全性房室传导阻滞患者心功能的影响[J]. 心脏杂志, 2013, 25(5): 558-560.
    引用本文: 邵 山, 王小青, 钱 波, 孙建辉. 右心室流出道间隔部起搏对完全性房室传导阻滞患者心功能的影响[J]. 心脏杂志, 2013, 25(5): 558-560.
    Effects of right ventricular outflow septal pacing on cardiac functions in patients with complete atrioventricular block[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2013, 25(5): 558-560.
    Citation: Effects of right ventricular outflow septal pacing on cardiac functions in patients with complete atrioventricular block[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2013, 25(5): 558-560.

    右心室流出道间隔部起搏对完全性房室传导阻滞患者心功能的影响

    Effects of right ventricular outflow septal pacing on cardiac functions in patients with complete atrioventricular block

    • 摘要: 目的:比较右心室流出道间隔部(RVS)起搏与右心室心尖部(RVA)起搏对左右心室间收缩同步性、左室重构及心功能的影响。方法: ①入选Ⅲ度房室传导阻滞患者61(男39,女22)例,随机分入RVS部起搏组(RVS组,n=33)和RVA部起搏组(RVA组,n=28)。②比较两组患者植入术中及术后12月心室电极导线参数(起搏阈值、R波感知及阻抗)的差异。③观察两组患者术前及术后12月QRS波时限;术后应用组织多普勒同步图(TSI)分别测定两组左、右心室侧壁基底部收缩达峰时间差(ΔTs)。评价心室间不同步的程度。④行多普勒超声心动图(UCG)检查,观察两组术前及术后12月左室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)及左室射血分数(LVEF)的变化,比较不同起搏部位对心功能的影响。结果: ①两组患者测试的起搏阈值、R波感知及导线阻抗无统计学差异。②两组患者术后QRS波时限均较术前延长(均P<001),RVA组较RVS组延长更为明显(P<001)。RVS组与RVA组ΔTs分别为(27±14) ms和(90±22) ms,有统计学差异(P<001)。③术后12亇月两组LVEDD均较术前增加,RVA明显大于RVS组[(54±5) mm vs.(51±5) mm,P<005]。 RVA组术后12月LVEDD较术前明显增加[(54±5) mm vs.(50±4) mm,P<005],术后12月两组LVEF均较术前降低[RVS组:(058±014) vs.(063±009),P<001; RVA组:(051±012) vs.(064±013),P<001],组间比差异不显著。结论: RVS起搏对心室间同步性、左室重构的影响要优于RVA起搏。

       

      Abstract: AIM:To compare the effect of right ventricular outflow tract septum (RVS) pacing and right ventricular apical (RVA) pacing on contraction synchrony, ventricular remodeling and cardiac functions. METHODS: Sixtyone patients (39 males, 22 females) with III atrium ventricular conduction block (AVB) were randomly divided into RVS group (n=33) and RVA group (n=28). The parameters of the pacing leads on implantation and postimplantation and changes of QRS duration of pre and postimplantation were observed. The ventricular synchrony was evaluated by tissue Doppler and left ventricular enddiastolic diameter (LVEDD) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were compared between groups. RESULTS: No statistical differences were observed in the pacing parameters between groups (P>005). Postimplantation QRS duration was significantly prolonged in both groups (P<001), especially in the RVA group (P<001). Ts (time to peak systolic velocity) of the left lateral wall to the right wall was (27±14) ms for RVS pacing and (90±22) ms for RVA pacing (P<001). LVEDD of postimplantation significantly increased compared with preimplantation in RVA group [(54±5) mm vs. (50±4) mm, P<0.05]. LVEF statistically decreased in both groups [RVS: (0.58±0.14) vs. (0.63±0.09), P<0.01; RVA: (0.51±0.12) vs. (0.64±0.13), P<0.01]. CONCLUSION: RVS pacing achieves a better effect on cardiac contraction synchrony and ventricular remodeling than RVA pacing.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回