冠脉内注射盐酸替罗非班在急性STEMI 急诊PCI中应用的有效性及安全性

    Safety and efficacy of intracoronary tirofiban injection in patients with STEMI before primary PCI

    • 摘要: 目的 评价冠脉内注射血小板膜糖蛋白(GP)Ⅱb/Ⅲa受体拮抗剂盐酸替罗非班在急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)急诊经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗中的安全性及有效性。方法 我院急性STEMI冠脉造影(CAG)显示梗死相关血管(IRA)有血栓征象的患者67例,分成试药组(PCI前冠脉内注射盐酸替罗非班+PCI,n=35)与对照组(直接PCI,n=32),对比2组患者PCI术中IRA远端TIMI血流,术后左室射血分数(LVEF),住院期间的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)及出血情况。结果 试药组术中无再流及再灌注心律失常的发生率明显低于对照组(3% vs 19%;3% vs 16%,P<0.05);试药组术后LVEF明显高于对照组[(57±5)% vs (51±10)%,P<0.05];住院期间MACE发生率试药组低于对照组(3% vs 9%),两组均未发生严重出血并发症。结论 急诊PCI前冠脉内缓慢注射盐酸替罗非班对急性STEMI患者行急诊PCI安全有效。

       

      Abstract: AIM To evaluate the safety and efficacy of GPⅡb/Ⅲa receptor antagonists intracoronary tirofiban injection in patients with acute STsegment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) before primary PCI. METHODS Sixtyseven acute STEMI patients (48 men and 19 women, aged 57±8 years old) with TAR thrombolysis during CAG from the past 2 years were divided into two groups: intracoronary tirofiban injection+PCI group (n=35) and primary PCI group (n=32). TIMI flow during operation, post operation cardiac function (left ventricular ejection fraction), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) rates and bleeding state in hospital were compared between the two groups. RESULTS The rates of noreflow and arrhyehmia in intracoronary tirofiban injection+PCI group were lower than that in primary PCI group(3% vs 19%, 3% vs 16%, P<0.05) and so was the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) rates (3% vs 9%). Post operation cardiac function (LVEF) of intracoronary tirofiban injection+PCI group was better than that in primary PCI group[(57±5)% vs (51±10)%, P<0.05] and no difference was found in severe hemorrhage between the two groups. CONCLUSION Intracoronary tirofiban injection before primary PCI in patients with STMEI is safe and effective.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回