王石雄, 赵启明, 曹云华, 李宁荫, 高秉仁, 吴向阳, 柳德斌. 比较两种手术治疗先天性心脏病疗效的Meta分析[J]. 心脏杂志, 2013, 25(3): 373-379. DOI: 10.13191/j.chj.2013.03.127.wangshx.032
    引用本文: 王石雄, 赵启明, 曹云华, 李宁荫, 高秉仁, 吴向阳, 柳德斌. 比较两种手术治疗先天性心脏病疗效的Meta分析[J]. 心脏杂志, 2013, 25(3): 373-379. DOI: 10.13191/j.chj.2013.03.127.wangshx.032
    WANG Shi-xiong, ZHAO Qi-ming, CAO Yun-hua, LI Ning-yin, GAO Bing-ren, WU Xiang-yang, LIU De-bin. Total thoracoscopic surgery vs.median sternotomy in treating congenital heart diseases: a meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2013, 25(3): 373-379. DOI: 10.13191/j.chj.2013.03.127.wangshx.032
    Citation: WANG Shi-xiong, ZHAO Qi-ming, CAO Yun-hua, LI Ning-yin, GAO Bing-ren, WU Xiang-yang, LIU De-bin. Total thoracoscopic surgery vs.median sternotomy in treating congenital heart diseases: a meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2013, 25(3): 373-379. DOI: 10.13191/j.chj.2013.03.127.wangshx.032

    比较两种手术治疗先天性心脏病疗效的Meta分析

    Total thoracoscopic surgery vs.median sternotomy in treating congenital heart diseases: a meta-analysis

    • 摘要: 目的:通过Meta分析评价完全胸腔手术(totally thoracoscopic surgery,TTS)与常规胸骨正中切口心内直视手术(median sternotomy,MS)两种术式治疗先天性心脏病(congenital heart diseases,CHD)的疗效。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library(2012年第7期)、VIP、CNKI、CBM和万方数据库,查找所有比较TTS和MS治疗先天性心脏病的随机对照试验(randomized controlled trials,RCT)与临床对照研究(controlled clincal trials,CCT),检索时限均为建库至2012年6月。同时手检纳入文献的参考文献,语种限制为中文和英文。按纳入排除标准由两人独立进行文献的筛选、资料提取和质量评价,最后将提取的资料采用RevMan 5.1软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入9个研究,包括3个RCT和6个CCT;共748例患者,其中TTS组364例,MS组384例。Meta分析结果显示:TTS组在呼吸机辅助呼吸时间加权均数差(WMD)=-1.17,95%CI(-2.15,-0.20),P=0.02、ICU时间WMD=-12.22,95%CI(-17.34,-7.10),P<0.01、胸腔闭式引流量WMD=-2.36,95%CI(-3.42,-1.18),P<0.01和住院时间WMD=-1.92,95%CI(-2.69,-1.16),P<0.01上都明显低于MS组,而主动脉阻断时间WMD=5.70,95%CI(1.33,10.07),P=0.01和CPB时间WMD=13.08,95%CI(3.48,22.69),P<0.01长于MS组,但是在手术时间WMD=0.25,95%CI(-0.18,0.69),P>0.05和术后并发症OR=1.21,95%CI(0.50,2.92),P>0.05两组差异无统计学意义。结论:TTS治疗先天性心脏病安全有效,创伤小,术后恢复快,美容效果好。

       

      Abstract: AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using total thoracoscopic surgery(TTS) and median sternotomy(MS) in treating congenital heart diseases(CHD).METHODS: Databases of PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library(Issue 7,2012),VIP,CNKI,CBM and Wanfang were searched from the date of database establishment to June 2012 for randomized controlled trials(RCTs) and controlled clinical trials(CCTs) concerning the treatment of CHD.References of those studies were also searched by hand.The language was limited to Chinese and English.After selection,data extraction and quality assessments were independently conducted by two reviewers and meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.1 software.RESULTS: A total of nine studies involving 364 TTS patients and 384 MS patients met the inclusion criteria.Of these nine studies,three were RCTs and the other six were CCTs.Resultsof meta-analyses showed that the TTS group had a better postoperative effect.Time of mechanical respiration(WMD=-1.17,95% CI: 2.15 to-0.20,P<0.05),time in ICU(WMD=-12.22,95% CI-17.34 to-7.10,P<0.01),chest-tube drainage(WMD=-2.36,95% CI:-3.42 to-1.18,P<0.01) and hospitalization days(WMD=-1.92,95% CI:-2.69 to-1.16,P<0.01) in TTS group were less than those in MS group.Aorta cross-clamping time(WMD=5.70,95% CI: 1.33 to 10.07,P=0.01) and bypass time(WMD=13.08,95% CI: 3.48 to 22.69,P<0.01) in TTS group were longer than those in MS group.Surgical time(WMD=0.25,95% CI:-0.18 to 0.69,P=0.25) and incidence of postoperative complications(OR=1.21,95% CI: 0.50 to 2.92,P>0.05) were not significantly different between groups.CONCLUSION: TTS in treating CHD is feasible and safe with less trauma,faster recovery and good cosmetic results.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回