刘靖, 林苏华, 李煜, 许健, 林镇国. 左束支区域起搏与右室间隔部起搏对房室传导阻滞患者新发房颤及心功能影响的对比[J]. 心脏杂志, 2023, 35(2): 168-172. DOI: 10.12125/j.chj.202108078
    引用本文: 刘靖, 林苏华, 李煜, 许健, 林镇国. 左束支区域起搏与右室间隔部起搏对房室传导阻滞患者新发房颤及心功能影响的对比[J]. 心脏杂志, 2023, 35(2): 168-172. DOI: 10.12125/j.chj.202108078
    Jing LIU, Su-hua LIN, Yu LI, Jian XU, Zhen-guo LIN. Effects of left bundle branch area pacing or right ventricular septal pacing on new-onset atrial fibrillation and cardiac functions in patients with atrioventricular block[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2023, 35(2): 168-172. DOI: 10.12125/j.chj.202108078
    Citation: Jing LIU, Su-hua LIN, Yu LI, Jian XU, Zhen-guo LIN. Effects of left bundle branch area pacing or right ventricular septal pacing on new-onset atrial fibrillation and cardiac functions in patients with atrioventricular block[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2023, 35(2): 168-172. DOI: 10.12125/j.chj.202108078

    左束支区域起搏与右室间隔部起搏对房室传导阻滞患者新发房颤及心功能影响的对比

    Effects of left bundle branch area pacing or right ventricular septal pacing on new-onset atrial fibrillation and cardiac functions in patients with atrioventricular block

    • 摘要:
        目的  探讨左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)对高心室起搏比例患者中远期新发房颤及心功能影响。
        方法  以因II度以上房室传导阻滞行DDD起搏器植入患者为研究对象,患者随机入组LBBAP高心室起搏比例组(LBBAP-high组)、右室间隔部起搏(RVSP)高心室起搏比例组(RVSP-high组)、RVSP低心室起搏比例组(RVSP-low组)。随访内容包括:各随访节点心房频率大于180次/min、持续时间大于1 min且发生自动模式转换(AMS)事件、动态心电图、超声心动图参数、NT-proBNP水平。分析三组患者的临床基本特征,使用 Kaplan-meier法绘制患者新发房颤的时间曲线,并采用COX 比例风险模型进行多因素相关性分析。对比三组患者半年期心超参数与NT-proBNP水平。
        结果  与 LBBAP-high组比较,起搏QRS宽度RVSP-low组升高(P <0.01),RVSP-high组升高(P<0.01)。随时间延长,患者术后新发房颤发生率逐渐增高。三组患者记录到房颤事件共有59例(57%),其中,LBBAP-high组15例(44%)、RVSP-low组11例(38%)、RVSP-high组33例(82%)。RVSP-high组患者新发房颤比率比LBBAP-high组及RVSP-low组显著增高(P<0.01)。以False Discovery Rate(FDR)法进行两两比较: LBBAP-high组和RVSP-high组组间的窦律保持率差异存在统计学意义(P<0.01);RVSP-high组和RVSP-low组组间的窦律保持率差异存在统计学意义(P<0.01)。LBBAP-high组和RVSP-low组组间的窦律保持率差异不存在统计学意义。COX单因素回归分析显示,高起搏比例的右室间隔部起搏(HR=3.004;95%CI:1.615~5.586;P<0.01)、低射血分数(HR=1.029;95%CI:1.004~1.054;P<0.05)及高血压(HR=1.889;95%CI:1.05~3.40;P<0.05)是术后新发房颤的独立危险因素。多因素回归分析显示,仅高比例的右室间隔部起搏(HR=5.572;95%CI:2.444~12.701;P<0.01)及高血压(HR=2.752;95%CI:1.342~5.642;P<0.05)是术后新发房颤的独立危险因素。术后半年随访,与LBBAP-high组(223±63)pg/mL比较,RVSP-high组(752±54)pg/mL的NT-proBNP水平升高(P<0.01);与RVSP-low组(405±48.7)pg/mL组比较,RVSP-high组的NT-proBNP水平升高(P<0.01)。
        结论  左束支区域起搏作为更为生理性的起搏方式,减少了新发房颤的比例。在这组患者中,左束支区域起搏未对患者中远期心功能产生不良影响。

       

      Abstract:
        AIM   To investigate the effect of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) on the incidence of new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and on cardiac functions in patients with medium or long-term high proportion of ventricular pacing.
        METHODS  Patients with atrioventricular block and indication for pacing were recruited and randomly assigned to LBBAP high ventricular pacing group (LBBAP-high Group), right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP) high ventricular pacing group (RVSP-high group) or RVSP low ventricular pacing group (RVSP-low group). Patients were followed up at 3 months, 6 months and every 6 months after the operations. The atrial high rate events (AHREs) documented by pacemaker, with frequency greater than 180 beats per minute, duration greater than 1 minute and automatic mode conversion (AMS) occurrence were recorded and deemed as AF events. AHREs, AF events documented by Holter monitor, echocardiography parameters, and NT-proBNP levels at each follow-up point were recorded. Kaplan-meier method was applied to draw the time curve of AF in each group and COX proportional hazard model was applied to analyze the correlation of multiple factors with new-onset AF.
        RESULTS  Compared with LBBAP high group, QRS width of pacing increased in RVSP low group (P<0.01) and RVSP high group (P<0.01). The incidence of new atrial fibrillation increased with time. A total of 59 cases (57%) of atrial fibrillation events were recorded in the three groups, including 15 cases (44%) in LBBAP high group, 11 cases (38%) in RVSP low group, and 33 cases (82%) in RVSP high group. The rate of new atrial fibrillation in RVSP high group was significantly higher than that in LBBAP high group and RVSP low group (P<0.01). The false discovery rate (FDR) method was used to compare two groups: the sinus rhythm retention rate between LBBAP high group and RVSP high group was statistically significant (P<0.01); There was significant difference in sinus rhythm retention rate between RVSP high group and RVSP low group (P<0.01). There was no significant difference in sinus rhythm retention between LBBAP high group and RVSP low group. COX single factor regression analysis showed that right ventricular septal pacing with high pacing ratio (HR=3.004; 95% CI: 1.615~5.586; P<0.01), low ejection fraction (HR=1.029; 95% CI: 1.004~1.054; P<0.05) and hypertension (HR=1.889; 95% CI: 1.05~3.40; P<0.05) were independent risk factors for new atrial fibrillation after surgery. Multivariate regression analysis showed that only a high proportion of right ventricular septal pacing (HR= 5.572; 95% CI: 2.444~12.701; P<0.01) and hypertension (HR=2.752; 95% CI: 1.342~5.642; P<0.05) were independent risk factors for postoperative new atrial fibrillation. Half a year after operation, compared with LBBAP high group (223 ± 63) pg/mL, the NT proBNP level in RVSP high group (752 ± 54) pg/mL increased (P<0.01); Compared with RVSP low group (405 ± 48.7) pg/mL group, the NT proBNP level in RVSP high group increased (P<0.01). CONDLUSION LBBAP, as a more physiological pacing mode, reduces the proportion of new-onset AF. In this group, LBBAP does not have adverse effects on medium or long-term cardiac functions.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回