何璐, 杜亚娟, 王星烨, 谢学刚, 张玉顺. 应用导丝漂流技术介入治疗小儿膜周部室间隔缺损[J]. 心脏杂志, 2021, 33(4): 379-383, 389. DOI: 10.12125/j.chj.202105098
    引用本文: 何璐, 杜亚娟, 王星烨, 谢学刚, 张玉顺. 应用导丝漂流技术介入治疗小儿膜周部室间隔缺损[J]. 心脏杂志, 2021, 33(4): 379-383, 389. DOI: 10.12125/j.chj.202105098
    Lu HE, Ya-juan DU, Xing-ye WANG, Xue-gang XIE, Yu-shun ZHANG. Transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children using a wire-drifting technique[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2021, 33(4): 379-383, 389. DOI: 10.12125/j.chj.202105098
    Citation: Lu HE, Ya-juan DU, Xing-ye WANG, Xue-gang XIE, Yu-shun ZHANG. Transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children using a wire-drifting technique[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2021, 33(4): 379-383, 389. DOI: 10.12125/j.chj.202105098

    应用导丝漂流技术介入治疗小儿膜周部室间隔缺损

    Transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children using a wire-drifting technique

    • 摘要:
        目的  探讨应用导丝漂流技术经导管介入治疗小儿膜周部室间隔缺损(perimembranous ventricular septal defect,PmVSD)的可行性及安全性。
        方法  分析2011年12月~2019年12月于西安交通大学第一附属医院结构性心脏病科行经导管介入治疗的PmVSD患儿资料(n = 256)。按术中建立动静脉轨道的方法,分为常规技术组(n = 132)和导丝漂流技术组(n = 124)。比较两组患者的手术成功率、一次性建立动静脉轨道的成功率、手术时间、术中严重心律失常及术后新发心律失常的发生率、三尖瓣返流(tricuspid regurgitation,TR)等有无统计学差异。
        结果  常规技术组手术成功率97.0%(127/132);导丝漂流技术组手术成功率97.6%(121/124),两组间无统计学差异。一次性建立动静脉轨道成功率导丝漂流技术组高(96.7% vs. 87.4%,P<0.05),手术时间两组间无明显统计学差异。手术成功的患者中,导丝漂流技术组术中严重心律失常发生率低(7.1% vs. 0%,P<0.05)。其中,术中常规技术组发生传导阻滞9例(7.1%),均经调整导管位置后恢复正常;导丝漂流技术组术中无传导阻滞发生。两组术后新发心律失常发生率无明显统计学差异。术后2年随访过程中,常规技术组TR较术前加重2例(3.9%),导丝漂流技术组无新发TR。
        结论  应用导丝漂流技术治疗PmVSD安全有效,在建立动静脉轨道过程中,可减少导管、导丝对缺损周围组织的刺激,从而减少术中传导阻滞的发生。

       

      Abstract:
        AIM  To explore the feasibility and safety of transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects (PmVSD) using a wire-drifting technique in children.
        METHODS  We retrospectively analyzed 256 pediatric patients diagnosed with PmVSD who underwent interventional treatment in our center from December 2011 to December 2019. Based on the method used for arteriovenous loop establishment during the procedure, the patients were divided into the conventional technique group and the wire-drifting technique group. Comparison between the two groups was made in the success rate of the procedure and one-time arteriovenous loop establishment, the operation time, the incidence of severe arrhythmia during the procedure and the incidence of new postoperative arrhythmia and tricuspid regurgitation (TR).
        RESULTS  In total, 127 of the 132 patients (97.0%) in the conventional technique group and 121 of the 124 patients (97.6%) in the wire-drifting technique group achieved procedural success, with no significant difference between the two groups. The wire-drifting technique group had a higher success rate in one-time arteriovenous loop establishment (96.7% vs. 87.4%, P<0.05). The procedure time was respectively with no statistical difference. Among the patients with successful procedure, the incidence of severe arrhythmia during the procedure in the wire-drifting technique group was significantly lower than that in the conventional technique group (7.1% vs. 0%, P<0.05). There was no atrioventricular block in the wire-drifting technique group during the procedure. There was no significant difference in the incidence of new-onset arrhythmias between the two groups (6.3% vs. 6.6%,). During the 2-year follow-up period, aggravated (mild to moderate) TR was observed in 2 patients (3.9%) in the conventional technique group and it was not observed in the wire-drifting technique group.
        CONCLUSION  Transcatheter closure of PmVSD with the wire-drifting technique is safe and effective in children. In PmVSD interventional treatment, it can replace traditional methods to establish arteriovenous loop, which reduces the stimulation of catheters and guidewires on the surrounding tissues of the defect, thereby reducing the occurrence of intraoperative atrioventricular block.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回