高曼, 成思瑶, 张飞飞, 郝清卿, 齐晓勇. 血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂对HFmrEF患者预后的影响[J]. 心脏杂志, 2021, 33(6): 596-599. DOI: 10.12125/j.chj.202103027
    引用本文: 高曼, 成思瑶, 张飞飞, 郝清卿, 齐晓勇. 血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂对HFmrEF患者预后的影响[J]. 心脏杂志, 2021, 33(6): 596-599. DOI: 10.12125/j.chj.202103027
    Man GAO, Si-yao CHENG, Fei-fei ZHANG, Qing-qing HAO, Xiao-yong QI. Effect of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor on prognosis of patients with heart failure and mid-range ejection fraction[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2021, 33(6): 596-599. DOI: 10.12125/j.chj.202103027
    Citation: Man GAO, Si-yao CHENG, Fei-fei ZHANG, Qing-qing HAO, Xiao-yong QI. Effect of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor on prognosis of patients with heart failure and mid-range ejection fraction[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2021, 33(6): 596-599. DOI: 10.12125/j.chj.202103027

    血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂对HFmrEF患者预后的影响

    Effect of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor on prognosis of patients with heart failure and mid-range ejection fraction

    • 摘要:
        目的  探索血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂(ARNI)对射血分数中间值的心力衰竭(HFmrEF)患者预后的影响。
        方法  自2019年1月起连续性收集河北省人民医院因心力衰竭入院的HFmrEF(射血分数在40%~49%之间)患者86例,对照组和实验组各43人。所有病人入院后在规范的心力衰竭治疗的基础上,对照组口服培哚普利片,实验组口服沙库巴曲缬沙坦片,均从小剂量起始,逐渐增加至目标剂量。收集患者的一般信息、入院时的生命体征、NYHA分级,既往病史、用药史、实验室检查、超声心动图及6 min步行实验等资料。随访患者出院1年后的NT-proBNP水平、左室射血分数、6 min步行试验、NYHA分级的改善、病死和心衰再住院的发生率以及两者的复合终点事件发生率。
        结果  两组基线资料均衡无统计学差异,随访1年,两组NT-ProBNP水平明显降低,左室射血分数明显升高(P<0.05),但两组之间无统计学差异。随访6WMT及心功能改善的结果 两组治疗后6WMT的数值比治疗前有明显提高(P<0.05),与培哚普利组相比,沙库巴曲缬沙坦组提高的更加明显(P<0.01)。在NYHA分级改善方面,沙库巴曲缬沙坦组改善率明显高于培哚普利组(P<0.05)。随访1年的预后事件,包括全因病死、因心力衰竭再住院、以及两者的复合事件发生率。沙库巴曲缬沙坦组病死率与培哚普利组相比无显著差异;因心力衰竭再住院的发生率及复合终点事件发生率明显低于培哚普利组(均P<0.05)。
        结论  血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂可改善射血分数中间值的心力衰竭患者的症状及运动耐力,并降低因心力衰竭再住院的发生率以及病死和再住院的复合终点事件。

       

      Abstract:
        AIM  To explore the impact of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor on the prognosis of heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF).
        METHODS  Patients who were diagnosed with chronic heart failure and had the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 40% and 49% in Hebei General Hospital from January, 2019 were consecutively enrolled. Eighty-six patients were divided into two groups with forty-three in each group, and the patients in the two groups were separately treated with oral sacubitril-valsartan and oral perindopril titrated, gradually from low dose to target dose on the basis of standard treatment of heart failure. Baseline data were collected, including demographic information, vital signs, NYHA class, history of comorbidities, history of drug use, biomarkers, echocardiography and six minute walking test (6MWT). After one-year follow up, NT-proBNP, LVEF, 6MWT, changes of NYHA class, rates of death, readmission for heart failure and the composite outcome of death and readmission for heart failure were reassessed.
        RESULTS  Eighty-six patients diagnosed with HFmrEF were enrolled. The baseline data were balanced in the two groups without significant difference. The level of NT-proBNP decreased and LVEF increased in both groups (P<0.05), but no difference was observed between the two groups. The distance of 6MWT and NYHA class improved in both groups but sacubitril-valsartan achieved better results (P<0.01). The one-year death rate in sacubitril-valsartan group and perindopril group was P<0.05. The composite outcome of death and readmission for heart failure in the two groups was P<0.05.
        CONCLUSION  Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor not only improves symptoms and exercise capacity, but also reduces the rate of readmission for heart failure and the composite outcome of death and readmission for heart failure in HFmrEF.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回