止血器在经桡动脉冠脉介入诊疗中的应用

    Radial artery homeostasis device in transradial coronary intervention

    • 摘要: 目的: 比较桡动脉穿刺点绷带压迫和止血器压迫方法的效果。方法: 随机将经桡动脉途径行冠脉介入诊疗的患者600例分成绷带组(n=200)和RDP700(800)止血器组(n=400),观察两组患者止血成功率、包扎止血的操作时间、压迫止血的总时间、术后2 d内出血发生率、并发症发生率和出院时间。结果: 止血器组操作时间、压迫时间和术后住院时间均短于绷带组,局部并发症(2 d内出血、皮下淤血和桡动脉闭塞)明显少于绷带组,两组均无严重并发症。结论: 经桡动脉冠脉介入诊疗后应用止血器止血效果安全、可靠,并发症发生率低。

       

      Abstract: AIM: To evaluate the safety and effect of radial artery homeostasis device “RDP700(800)” after transradial coronary artery intervention. METHODS: Six hundred patients treated with transradial coronary intervention were divided into two groups: RDP700(800) group (400 cases) and bandaging group (200 cases). Homeostasis effect, homeostasis surgical time, homeostasis consumption time, bleeding accident in the first 2 h, complication rate and discharge time were compared between groups. RESULTS: No serious complications were found in either group but the homeostasis surgical time, oppression time and in-hospital days after operation in RDP700(800) group were shorter than those in bandaging group. CONCLUSION: The radial artery homeostasis device RDP700(800) is safe and effective.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回