内关穴电针预处理减轻小鼠心肌缺血再灌注损伤的代谢机制

    Metabolic mechanism of electroacupuncture preconditioning at Neiguan (PC6) attenuating myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice

    • 摘要:
      目的 探讨电针刺激内关穴对小鼠心肌缺血再灌注损伤(myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury,MI/RI)的保护作用,并基于代谢组学分析其潜在机制。
      方法 小鼠随机分为以下四组:① 假手术组(对照组,Sham);② 模型组(MI/RI);③ 内关穴刺激组(PC6+Sham);④内关穴刺激+模型组(PC6+MI/RI)。其中,PC6+Sham组和PC6+MI/RI组于造模前接受连续7 d内关穴电针刺激,末次电针处理后10 min,通过结扎左冠状动脉前降支构建小鼠MI/RI模型(Sham组仅行开胸手术但不结扎)。再灌注结束后,行超声心动图检测心功能,随后处死小鼠并采集标本。通过Evans blue/TTC双染色法测定心肌梗死面积,酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法测心肌损伤标志酶含量,采用液相色谱-质谱联用技术(LC-MS/MS)分析心肌组织代谢物,并运用多元变量统计方法(PCA/OPLS-DA)筛选差异代谢物及富集相关代谢通路。
      结果  电针针刺内关穴预处理可减轻小鼠心肌损伤,改善超声心动图、血清生化指标异常,降低心肌梗死面积,相关结果均具有统计学差异(P<0.05或P<0.01)。代谢组学分析显示,模型组与假手术组代谢轮廓有明显差异,有187种候选差异代谢物,二磷酸腺苷等为显著差异代谢物,富集到D - 氨基酸代谢等通路;内关模型组与模型组代谢轮廓也有明显差异,有82种候选差异代谢物,肌酸等显著上调,乳酸等显著下调,富集到蛋白质消化和吸收等显著差异代谢通路。
      结论 电针刺激内关穴可减轻MI/RI进程,其保护机制可能与调控蛋白质消化与吸收等代谢通路有关。代谢组学分析发现,L-丝氨酸等差异代谢物可能作为潜在生物标志物,参与电针预处理对MI/RI的保护作用。

       

      Abstract:
      AIM  To investigate the cardioprotective effects of electroacupuncture (EA) at the Neiguan acupoint (PC6) against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MI/RI) in mice and explore the underlying metabolic mechanisms using metabolomics.
      METHODS  Mice were randomly assigned to four groups: ① Sham (thoracotomy without ligation), ②MI/RI (ischemia-reperfusion model), ③ PC6+Sham (EA at PC6 without MI/RI), and ④ PC6+MI/RI (EA preconditioning + MI/RI). The PC6+Sham and PC6+MI/RI groups received EA at PC6 for 7 consecutive days before modeling. The MI/RI model was induced by left anterior descending coronary artery ligation, followed by reperfusion. Cardiac function was assessed via echocardiography, and myocardial injury was evaluated by infarct size (Evans blue/TTC dual staining), myocardial injury marker enzyme levels (ELISA), and myocardial tissue metabolites (LC-MS/MS). Multivariate statistical analyses (PCA/OPLS-DA) were used to identify differential metabolites and enriched metabolic pathways.
      RESULTS  EA preconditioning at PC6 significantly improved cardiac function, reduced infarct size, and attenuated serum biomarker elevations (P<0.05 or P<0.01). Metabolomic analysis revealed distinct metabolic profiles between the MI/RI and Sham groups, identifying 187 candidate differential metabolites (e.g., ADP) and enriched pathways, including D-amino acid metabolism. Compared to MI/RI alone, the PC6+MI/RI group exhibited a distinct metabolic profile, with 82 candidate differential metabolites (e.g., upregulated creatine, downregulated lactate) and significant pathway enrichment (e.g., protein digestion and absorption).
      CONCLUSION  EA preconditioning at PC6 mitigates MI/RI progression. Its protective mechanism may be associated with the regulation of metabolic pathways such as protein digestion and absorption. Metabolomic analysis revealed differential metabolites such as L-serine may serve as potential biomarkers for EA’s cardioprotective effects against MI/RI.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回