小剂量替罗非班对行PPCI的STEMI患者住院结局的影响

    Effect of low-dose tirofiban on hospitalization outcomes in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI

    • 摘要:
      目的 分析接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入(PPCI)治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者冠脉内应用联合静脉输注小剂量替罗非班对住院结局的影响。
      方法 纳入2016年9月~2022年12月行PPCI的STEMI患者(n=748),根据替罗非班使用情况分为替罗非班使用组(观察组,n=284)和非替罗非班使用组(对照组,n=464)。使用逆概率加权和1∶1贪婪匹配平衡两组患者的基线协变量并比较两组患者的病死率。使用Logistic回归分析替罗非班对住院生存结局的影响。
      结果 加权前与对照组比较,观察组倾向评分高(P<0.01),高脂血症史比例低(P<0.01),外周动脉疾病史比例高(P<0.05),既往用药中他汀、β受体阻滞剂、ACEI及ARB使用比例高(均P<0.01),两组患者基线特征经过逆概率加权后,达到组间平衡。介入资料及生存结局加权前与对照组比较,观察组倾向评分高(P<0.01),LAD罪犯血管比例高(P<0.05)、LCX罪犯血管比例低(P<0.05)、IABP比例高(P<0.01)、TIMI血流<3级比例高(P<0.01) 、室性心动过速与心室颤动比例高(均P<0.05)。在住院期间,观察组19例(6.7%)患者死亡,对照组14例(3.0%)患者死亡,逆概率加权前,Logistic回归分析显示替罗非班增加院内死亡风险(OR=2.305,95%CI:1.137~4.673, P<0.05);逆概率加权后,Logistic回归分析显示替罗非班对住院结局无明显影响(OR=1.438, 95%CI:0.653~3.168)。贪婪匹配后,Logistic回归分析也显示替罗非班应用对住院结局无明显影响(OR=1.265,95%CI:0.412~3.888),与逆概率加权分析结果一致。
      结论 对行PPCI的急性STEMI患者,给予冠脉内应用联合静脉输注小剂量替罗非班,对患者住院结局无显著影响。

       

      Abstract:
      AIM To analyze the effect of intracoronary administration combined with intravenous infusion of low-dose tirofiban on hospitalization outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).
      METHODS Patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI (n=748) from September 2016 to December 2022 were enrolled and divided into the tirofiban group (observation group, n=284) and the non-tirofiban group (control group, n=464) based on the use of tirofiban. Inverse probability weighting and 1:1 greedy matching were applied to balance the baseline covariates of the two groups and compare their mortality rates. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the effect of intracoronary administration combined with intravenous infusion of tirofiban on hospitalization outcomes.
      RESULTS Compared with the control group before weighting, the observation group had a higher propensity score (P<0.01), a lower proportion of hyperlipidemia history (P<0.01), a higher proportion of peripheral arterial disease history (P<0.05), and a higher proportion of statin, beta blocker, ACEI, and ARB use (all P<0.01). After inverse probability weighting, the baseline characteristics of the two groups of patients reached inter group balance. Compared with the control group before weighted intervention data and survival outcomes, the observation group had a higher propensity score (P<0.01), a higher proportion of LAD culprit vessel (P<0.05), a lower proportion of LCX culprit vessel (P<0.05), a higher proportion of IABP (P<0.01), a higher proportion of TIMI blood flow<grade 3 (P<0.01), and a higher proportion of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (all P<0.05). During hospitalization, 19 patients (6.7%) in the observation group died, while 14 patients (3.0%) in the control group died. Before inverse probability weighting, logistic regression analysis showed that tirofiban increased the risk of in-hospital mortality (OR=2.305, 95% CI: 1.137~4.673, P<0.05); After inverse probability weighting, logistic regression analysis showed that tirofiban had no significant effect on hospitalization outcomes (OR=1.438, 95% CI: 0.653~3.168). After greedy matching, logistic regression analysis also showed that the use of tirofiban had no significant effect on hospitalization outcomes (OR=1.265, 95% CI: 0.412~3.888), consistent with the results of inverse probability weighted analysis.
      CONCLUSION Intracoronary administration combined with intravenous infusion of low-dose tirofiban in patients with acute STEMI undergoing PPCI has no significant effect on hospitalization outcomes.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回