急性心肌梗死后急诊PCI患者心电图两项指标与恶性心律失常风险的关系及阈值效应分析

    Study on relationship and threshold effect between Tp-Te/QT ratio, P wave dispersion on electrocardiogram and risk of malignant arrhythmia in patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention after acute myocardial infarction

    • 摘要:
      目的 探讨急性心肌梗死后急诊PCI患者心电图Tp-Te/QT比值、P波离散度与恶性心律失常风险的关系及阈值效应分析。
      方法 回顾性分析2020年3月至2024年5月于我院收治的200例急性心肌梗死后接受急诊经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗患者,根据患者治疗后是否发生恶性室性心律失常分为发生组(58例)和未发生组(142例)。收集并比较两组患者一般临床资料、冠脉造影及心脏彩超检查结果、心电图检查。多元线性回归分析Tp-Te/QT、P波离散度与心率变异性的关系。分层回归分析Tp-Te/QT、P波离散度与与恶性心律失常风险在不同亚组的关系。使用R3.6.1软件包建立Tp-Te/QT、P波离散度的平滑拟合曲线并进行阈值效应分析、计算阈值折点前后OR值及其95%CI。
      结果 与未发生组比较,发生组TIMI血流分级0级比例高,3级比例低(P<0.05)、LVEDD增大(P<0.05)、LVEF降低(P<0.05)、Killip分级Ⅰ级比例低,(Ⅱ~Ⅳ)级比例高(P<0.01)、SV降低(P<0.01)、NT-proBNP升高(P<0.01)、cTnI升高(P<0.01)、LVESD升高(P<0.01);与较低水平相比,较高水平的Tp-Te/QT、QTd、P波离散度发生恶性心率失常风险更高(P<0.05)。Tp-Te/QT、P波离散度均是可以预测心率变异性指标SDNN、SDANN、RMSSD降低的独立危险因素(均P<0.05)。分别按性别、年龄、BMI、置入支架数、Killip分级、TIMI血流分级等变量进行分层分析,Tp-Te/QT、P波离散度与恶性心律失常风险在各分层中的关联均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。曲线拟合分析发现,Tp-Te/QT ≤ 0.29时,随着Tp-Te/QT增加,患者发生恶性心律失常风险不受影响(OR=1.000, 95%CI: 0.894~1.120);Tp-Te/QT>0.29时,随着Tp-Te/QT增加,患者发生恶性心律失常风险明显增加(OR=1.712, 95%CI: 1.294~1.821, P<0.05)。P波离散度 ≤ 42.28 ms时,随着P波离散度增加,患者发生恶性心律失常风险不受影响(OR=1.001, 95%CI: 0.822~1.531);P波离散度>42.28 ms时,随着P波离散度增加,患者发生恶性心律失常风险明显增加(OR=1.312, 95%CI: 1.159~1.437, P<0.05)。
      结论 Tp-Te/QT和P波离散度是急性心肌梗死患者急诊PCI后发生恶性心律失常的独立影响因素,临床可据此有效预测急性心肌梗死患者PCI后恶性心律失常的发生情况。

       

      Abstract:
      AIM  To investigate the relationship and threshold effect between the Tp-Te/QT ratio, P wave dispersion and the risk of malignant arrhythmia in patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
      METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted in 200 patients who were admitted to our hospital from March 2020 to May 2024 and underwent emergency PCI after AMI. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they developed malignant ventricular arrhythmias after treatment: occurrence group (58 cases) and non-occurrence group (142 cases). General clinical data, coronary angiography, echocardiography results and electrocardiogram (ECG) findings were collected and compared between the two groups. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between Tp-Te/QT, P wave dispersion and heart rate variability. Stratified regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between Tp-Te/QT, P wave dispersion and the risk of malignant arrhythmia in different subgroups. Smooth fitting curves for Tp-Te/QT and P wave dispersion were established using R3.6.1 software, and threshold effect analysis was conducted to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) before and after the threshold points.
      RESULTS Compared with the non occurrence group, the incidence group had a higher proportion of TIMI blood flow grade 0, a lower proportion of 3 grades (P<0.05), an increased LVEDD (P<0.05), a decreased LVEF (P<0.05), a lower proportion of Killip grade I, a higher proportion of (II-IV) grades (P<0.01), a lower SV (P<0.01), an increased NT-proBNP (P<0.01), an increased cTnI (P<0.01), and an increased LVESD (P<0.01); Compared with lower levels, higher levels of Tp Te/QT, QTd, and P-wave dispersion have a higher risk of malignant arrhythmia (P<0.05). Tp Te/QT and P-wave dispersion are independent risk factors that can predict the decrease of heart rate variability indicators SDNN, SDANN, and RMSSD (all P<0.05). Stratified analysis was conducted based on variables such as gender, age, BMI, number of stents implanted, Killip grading, and TIMI blood flow grading. The association between Tp Te/QT, P-wave dispersion, and the risk of malignant arrhythmia was statistically significant in each stratification (all P<0.05). Curve fitting analysis found that when Tp Te/QT ≤ 0.29, as Tp Te/QT increases, the risk of malignant arrhythmia in patients is not affected (OR=1.000, 95% CI: 0.894~1.120); when Tp Te/QT>0.29, as Tp Te/QT increases, the risk of malignant arrhythmia in patients significantly increases (OR=1.712, 95% CI: 1.294~1.821, P<0.05). When P-wave dispersion ≤ 42.28 ms, as P-wave dispersion increases, the risk of malignant arrhythmia in patients is not affected (OR=1.001, 95% CI: 0.822~1.531); when P-wave dispersion>42.28 ms As the P-wave dispersion increases, the risk of malignant arrhythmia in patients significantly increases (OR=1.312, 95% CI: 1.159~1.437, P<0.05).
      CONCLUSION Tp-Te/QT and P wave dispersion are independent factors influencing the occurrence of malignant arrhythmias in patients after emergency PCI for acute myocardial infarction. Clinically, these parameters can be effectively used to predict the risk of malignant arrhythmias following PCI in such patients.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回