急性心肌梗死I期康复对无创心输出量的影响

    Effects of different phase I rehabilitation programs on noninvasive cardiac output measurement of acute myocardial infarction

    • 摘要:
      目的 探索急性心肌梗死患者安全有效的I期心脏康复方案。
      方法 本研究为随机对照临床试验,纳入102例AMI患者,随机分为3组后给予不同的I期CR方案。其中常规治疗组(33例)仅接受一般治疗,运动治疗组(35例)在入院(24~48) h给予早期阶梯式运动训练,综合治疗组(34例)在阶梯式运动训练的基础上强化压力管理措施。入院、出院以及出院6个月时分别进行静息无创心输出量评估,对患者随访直至出院后6个月,比较不同I期CR方案的疗效差异及安全性。
      结果 三组患者年龄、性别、心梗类型、手术类型、堵塞血管数、支架个数、并存疾病等项目差异无统计学意义。入院时三组患者的各项无创心输出量指标均未表现出统计学差异。在出院时,运动治疗组和综合治疗组患者的SVR降低,较常规治疗组有改善(均P <0.05),而两个治疗组之间无明显差异。出院6个月后,运动治疗组和综合治疗组患者的LVEF升高、CTI升高、SVR降低,均较常规治疗组表现出更大的改善(均P<0.01),但两个治疗组间三项指标仍未表现出明显差异。三组患者住院期间及出院6个月发生临床事件的概率没有统计学差异。
      结论 I期运动治疗和综合治疗均可以有效改善患者的血流动力学指标,且不增加临床事件发生的概率。

       

      Abstract:
      AIM To explore a safe and effective stage I cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
      METHODS This was a randomized controlled clinical trial and 102 AMI patients were randomly divided into 3 groups and they were given different phase I CR program. The conventional group (n=33) only received general treatment, the exercise group (n=35) received early stepped exercise training within 24-48 hours of admission and the comprehensive group (n=34) strengthened stress management measures on the basis of stepped exercise training. Resting noninvasive cardiac output was evaluated at admission, discharge and 6 months after discharge. Patients were followed up until 6 months after discharge and the efficacy and safety of different phase I CR programs were compared.
      RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference in age, gender, type of myocardial infarction, type of surgery, number of blocked blood vessels, number of stents, and coexisting diseases among the three groups of patients. At admission, there were no statistically significant differences in various non-invasive cardiac output indicators among the three groups of patients. At discharge, the SVR of patients in the exercise therapy group and the comprehensive treatment group decreased, showing improvement compared to the conventional treatment group (both P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between the two treatment groups. After 6 months of discharge, the LVEF, CTI, and SVR of patients in the exercise therapy group and the comprehensive therapy group increased, and the CTI increased, and the SVR decreased, all showing greater improvement than those in the conventional treatment group (all P<0.01), but there was no significant difference in the three indicators between the two treatment groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the probability of clinical events occurring during hospitalization and 6 months after discharge among the three groups of patients.
      CONCLUSION Both phase I exercise therapy and phase I comprehensive therapy effectively improve the noninvasive cardiac output indexes of patients without increasing the probability of clinical events.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回