玉晓露, 赵连友, 张志敏, 邹 青, 卢 凡, 卫聪颖, 丁 璐. 氨氯地平联合缬沙坦治疗原发性高血压的效果及对脉搏波传导速度的影响[J]. 心脏杂志, 2014, 26(4): 429-432.
    引用本文: 玉晓露, 赵连友, 张志敏, 邹 青, 卢 凡, 卫聪颖, 丁 璐. 氨氯地平联合缬沙坦治疗原发性高血压的效果及对脉搏波传导速度的影响[J]. 心脏杂志, 2014, 26(4): 429-432.
    Efficacy of amlodipine-valsartan combination in hypertensive patients and its effects on pulse wave velocity[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2014, 26(4): 429-432.
    Citation: Efficacy of amlodipine-valsartan combination in hypertensive patients and its effects on pulse wave velocity[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2014, 26(4): 429-432.

    氨氯地平联合缬沙坦治疗原发性高血压的效果及对脉搏波传导速度的影响

    Efficacy of amlodipine-valsartan combination in hypertensive patients and its effects on pulse wave velocity

    • 摘要: 目的:观察氨氯地平联合缬沙坦治疗原发性高血压(essential hypertension,EH)的效果及其对脉搏波传导速度(baPWV)的影响。方法: 将EH患者100例随机分为氨氯地平+缬沙坦组(氨+缬组)和氨氯地平组(氨组),每组各50例。治疗24周后,测定各组血压、心率和baPWV的变化。结果: ①治疗24周后,氨+缬组患者收缩压、舒张压、baPWV均显著低于氨组 [收缩压:(114±9) mmHg vs.(131±14) mmHg;舒张压:(72±7) mmHg vs.(84±8) mmHg;baPWV:(1457±198) cm/s vs.(1544±222) cm/s,均P<0.05]。②氨+缬组患者治疗后心率与治疗前相比显著降低[(74±12)次/min vs.(68±11)次/min,P<0.05],而氨组治疗前后心率变化无统计学差异[(73±10)次/min vs.(72±9)次/min]。③氨+缬组和氨组降压治疗的总有效率分别为86%和64%,两者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。④氨+缬组随访期间4例患者出现头痛,2例患者出现干咳,氨组有13例出现脚踝水肿,且症状均随治疗自动消失,其余患者均未出现严重不良反应。结论: 氨氯地平联合缬沙坦与氨氯地平单药相比治疗EH的效果更优,安全性更好,并且能降低baPWV,具有逆转动脉硬化的作用。

       

      Abstract: AIM:To observe the efficacy of amlodipine-valsartan combination in hypertensive patients and its effects on brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV). METHODS: One hundred hypertensive patients were randomly divided into amlodipine-valsartan group (n=50) and amlodipine group (n=50). Blood pressure, heart rate and pulse wave velocity were measured for each group before and after 24-week treatment. RESULTS: After the 24-week treatment, SBP, DBP, and baPWV of the hypertensive patients in amlodipine-valsartan combination group were significantly lower than that of amlodipine group [SBP: (114±9) mmHg vs.(131±14) mmHg; DBP: (72±7) mmHg vs.(84±8) mmHg; baPWV: (1457±198) cm/s vs.(1544±222) cm/sec, all P<0.05). In the amlodipine-valsartan combination group, heart rate of the hypertensive patients were significantly lower [(74±12)/min vs.(68±11)/min, P<0.05] after treatment, whereas in the amlodipine group no significant difference [(73±10)/min vs.(72±9)/min] was observed. The total efficacy rate of amlodipine-valsartan combination group was higher than that of the amlodipine group (86% vs. 64%, P<0.05). Four hypertensive patients reported headache and two patients in the amlodipine-valsartan combination group had cough. Thirteen hypertensive patients had peripheral edema in the amlodipine group. All symptoms gradually disappeared with the ongoing treatment. No severe adverse side effects occurred during the 24-week treatment. CONCLUSION: Initial combination therapy for hypertension with amlodipine-valsartan is superior to amlodipine monotherapy in efficacy, safety and reversing arteriosclerosis.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回