牛俊芳, 李 佳. 两种剂量瑞舒伐他汀治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效比较[J]. 心脏杂志, 2014, 26(5): 558-561.
    引用本文: 牛俊芳, 李 佳. 两种剂量瑞舒伐他汀治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效比较[J]. 心脏杂志, 2014, 26(5): 558-561.
    Rosuvastatin therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2014, 26(5): 558-561.
    Citation: Rosuvastatin therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction[J]. Chinese Heart Journal, 2014, 26(5): 558-561.

    两种剂量瑞舒伐他汀治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效比较

    Rosuvastatin therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction

    • 摘要: 目的:探讨不同剂量瑞舒伐他汀治疗急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的降脂疗效和安全性的评价。方法: 选取在我院冠心病重症监护室2012年1月~9月的232例AMI患者,分成强化治疗(强化组)和普通剂量组(常规组),强化组:178例,瑞舒伐他汀 20 mg/d;常规组:54例,瑞舒伐他汀 10 mg/d。对出院时丙氨酸转移酶(ALT)和(或)门冬氨酸转移酶(AST)升高超过正常值3倍以上的患者服用剂量减半或停用,即强化组患者瑞舒伐他汀10 mg/d,常规组患者暂时停用瑞舒伐他汀。比较入院时、出院时及随访1个月、3个月的血脂指标、超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、肝肾功能变化及主要心血管事件的发生情况。结果: ①两组的总胆固醇(TC)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、载脂蛋白B(ApoB)均有显著下降(P<0.05),其中强化组在出院1个月时降低LDL-C的水平更显著(P<0.05)。②两组患者的hs-CRP出院后均有显著下降,但两组间比较差异无统计学意义。③出院后患者返院复查肝肾功能,两组比较差异无统计学意义。④对主要心血管事件进行3个月随访,强化组无患者死亡,常规组3例死亡,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论: AMI患者早期应用瑞舒伐他汀强化治疗更有效、更安全。

       

      Abstract: AIM:To assess the safety and the lipid-lowering efficacy of different doses of rosuvastatin in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: A total of 232 AMI patients admitted to our hospital from January 2012 to September were divided into intensive treatment group (group A, n=178, rosuvastatin 20 mg/day) and the common dose group (group B, n=54, rosuvastatin 10 mg/day). Patients in group A with increased liver enzyme level (three times higher than normal) at discharge took rosuvastatin 10 mg daily and patients in group B under the same conditions stopped taking rosuvastatin. Lipid profiles, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, liver and kidney function, and major cardiovascular events were compared at admission, discharge, 1 month and 3 months after discharge. RESULTS: Total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, apolipoprotein B (apoB) in both groups significantly decreased (P<0.05), and LDL-C level was more significantly decreased 1 month after discharge in group A (P<0.05). Hs-CRP significantly decreased after discharge, with no statistical difference between groups. After discharge, no statistical difference was found in liver and kidney functions between groups. Three-month follow-up showed statistical differences in major cardiovascular events between group A and group B (death, 0 vs. 3, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Intensive rosuvastatin therapy is safe and more effective for patients with AMI.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回